BATFE doing away with Tax Stamps for Suppressors?

He said / she said about anything new coming out or changes within the industry

Junior Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:28 am
Status: Offline

Postby MrM4 » Sat Jul 28, 2012 10:03 pm

As an SOT I have heard zero about that. My guess is that is %100 fiction. The GCA of 1934 would have to be ammended to allow the removal of the $200 tax stamp from the process. If that was at all true, there would be info availible on a bill to create the amendment to the law.

Indigo Carmine
Junior Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:57 am
Status: Offline

Postby Indigo Carmine » Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:07 am

Out of historical ignorance, was the suppressor even a reality in 1934 or added later?

After posing the question I see the Maxim was patented in 1909. How prevalent were they in 1934 none the less?
User avatar

Senior Member
Posts: 433
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:20 pm
Status: Offline

Postby Bendersquint » Mon Jul 30, 2012 6:29 pm

Its totally bunk, just call the ATF they will verify it.

Yes they were prevalent in 1934. The reason they were put on the list was to prevent poaching.
http://www.stalkingrhino.com - 07/02 - Jailbreaking, recoring, integrals, suppressors, custom NFA!

Return to “Rumor Mill”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest